Posted by: crystalclearconservative | May 9, 2008

Why Michael Steele Should Be McCain’s Vice Presidential Pick?

For many who know me, they know that I hail from the State (i.e. The People’s Republic) of Maryland (born, raised, then kicked out after I declared that I was a Republican, New York Yankees Fan and an unapologetic Pittsburgh Steelers Fan…my AFC Team). When I was living in Maryland, I had the privilege of witnessing the dynamic duo of then-Governor Bob Ehrlich and then-Lieutenant Governor Michael Steele. Both of these men led with dignity and gave Maryland a glimpse of prosperity, lower taxes and gasp, a governor’s office without scandal.

However, one part of the dynamic duo began to shine after he declared that he was running for the U.S. Senate to replace Paul Sarbanes. Steele showed that he had fresh ideas and a dedication of being a strong, principled leader who was determined to bring conservatism back to the halls of Congress. With such a strong commitment to party building and returning the country back to the ideals on which it was founded, Steele became a rising star amongst Republicans across the United States. Although he lost his race in 2006, he has now become a celebrity in the GOP through his leadership of GOPAC.

Steele would not only bring diversity to our ticket, but he brings back the enthusiasm and energy that our party has been lacking recently. McCain would be wise to choose Steele, who is a strong leader with much charisma. If Steele were McCain’s running mate, there would also be much crossover appeal as well as the energized Conservative base. While there are many cons to Steele being selected as VP, the pros far outweigh the cons. McCain/Steele has a nice ring, doesn’t it?

Responses

Michael Steele is pro-abortion.

Pick J.C. Watts.

[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]

Michael Steele is Catholic and pro-life. The only areas where he distances himself from the pro-life platform is when he states that Roe v. Wade should be overturned and advocating for stem-cell research.

On April 28, 2006, Len Lazarick from The Examiner wrote an article entitled “Power of an Individual” which had this amazing quote detailing Steele’s pro-life views.

“Q: African-American. Republican. Catholic. Pro-life. Does that put you in a little box?

A: It puts me in the mainstream of America, baby. What you just laid out is one way to describe Michael Steele. The other way to describe him is he’s a brother who cares about the working man and woman. As an African-American, I think it’s time that we respect the fact that there is a wide range of opinion and diversity of thought. Kweisi Mfume doesn’t represent every black voice in Maryland. I don’t represent every black voice in Maryland. And Ben Cardin certainly doesn’t either. The reality is that this will be an election about voices, and the people of this state will get to hear a lot of voices. They’ll gravitate to the one that resonates in their hearts and in their minds.”

On the other hand, J.C. Watts would be a great choice as well. He is pro-life and was a dynamic leader in the U.S. House. In fact, he also had national exposure which would help with name recognition in other areas of the country.

So, there are two good choices for a Vice Presidential candidate.

http://gardenax.wordpress.com/

To James Bowden.

If Watts is not pro-life, then he would make an excellent pick for John McCain — since McCain’s also a baby killer.

I meant Steele, not Watts.

Leave a response

Your response:

Categories